Transformations between CM and lab frame

10.3 Transformations between CM and lab frame

Even though the use of the invariant mass simpliﬁes calculations considerably, it clearly does not provide all necessary information. It does suggest however, that a natural frame to analyse reactions is the CM frame. Often we shall analyse a process in this frame, and use a Lorentz transformation to get information about processes in the laboratory frame. Since almost all processes involve the scattering (deﬂection) of one particle by another (or a number of others), this is natural example for such a procedure, see the sketch in Fig. 10.2. The same procedure can also be applied to the case of production of particles, such as the annihilation process discussed above.

scatteringangle

Figure 10.2: A sketch of a collision between two particles

Before the collision the beam particle moves with four-momentum

p_{b} = (p_{l a b}, 0, 0, \sqrt{m_{b}^{2} c^{4} + p_{l a b}^{2} c^{2}})

(10.11)

and the target particle $m_{t}$ is at rest,

p_{t} = (0, 0, 0, m_{t} c^{2}) .

(10.12)

We ﬁrst need to determine the velocity $v$ of the Lorentz transformation that bring is to the centre-of-mass frame. We use the Lorentz transformation rules for momenta to ﬁnd that in a Lorentz frame moving with velocity $v$ along the $x$ -axis relative to the CM frame we have

\begin{array}{rcl} p_{b x}^{'} & = & γ (v) (p_{l a b} - v E_{l a b} ∕ c^{2}) \\ p_{t x}^{'} & = & - m_{t} v γ (v) . & (10.13) \end{array}

Sine in the CM frame these numbers must be equal in size but opposite in sign, we ﬁnd a linear equation for $v$ , with solution

v = \frac{p_{l a b}}{m_{t} + E_{l a b} ∕ c^{2}} \approx c (1 - \frac{m_{t}}{p_{l a b}}) .

(10.14)

Now if we know the momentum of the beam particle in the CM frame after collision,

(p_{f} cos 𝜃_{C M}, p_{f} sin 𝜃_{C M}, 0, E_{f}^{'}),

(10.15)

where $𝜃_{C M}$ is the CM scattering angle we can use the inverse Lorentz transformation, with velocity $- v$ , to try and ﬁnd the lab momentum and scattering angle,

\begin{array}{rcl} γ (v) (p_{f} cos 𝜃_{C M} + v E_{f}^{'} ∕ c^{2}) & = & p_{f l a b} cos 𝜃_{l a b} \\ p_{f} sin 𝜃_{C M} & = & p_{f l a b} sin 𝜃_{l a b}, & (10.16) \end{array}

from which we conclude

tan 𝜃_{l a b} = \frac{1}{γ (v)} \frac{p_{f} sin 𝜃_{C M}}{p_{f} cos 𝜃_{C M} + v E_{f}^{'} ∕ c^{2}} .

(10.17)

Of course in experimental situations we shall often wish to transform from lab to CM frames, which can be done with equal ease.

To understand some of the practical consequences we need to look at the ultra-relativistic limit, where $p_{l a b} ≫ m ∕ c$ . In that case $v \approx c$ , and $γ (v) \approx {(p_{l a b} ∕ 2 m_{t} c^{2})}^{1 ∕ 2}$ . This leads to

tan 𝜃_{l a b} \approx \sqrt{\frac{2 m_{t} c^{2}}{p_{l a b}}} \frac{u sin 𝜃_{C}}{u cos 𝜃_{C} + c}

(10.18)

Here $u$ is the velocity of the particle in the CM frame. This function is always strongly peaked in the forward direction unless $u \approx c$ and $cos 𝜃_{C} \approx - 1$ .

[forward][back][up]